According to Gartner contributor David Mitchell Smith,Ĭloud computing is perceived as less secure. Is Google Drive Less Secure than On-Premise Solutions?Ī common misconception among proponents of on-premises solutions is that “the cloud” is inherently less secure. Needless to say, it’s well worth the additional time, effort, and money to implement the proper Google Drive security protocol compared to the repercussions of a data breach.

Additionally, IBM reported that the average size of a data breach is 25,575 records.

Although the total cost of a data breach is hard to estimate, a 2019 report by IBM found that the average cost of a data breach is $3.92 million. Its study also pointed to a wide range of potential consequences, including:ĭata breaches can also be incredibly expensive. Organizations are also at risk from a “slow leak” of content, such as intellectual property and other confidential documents.Īccording to a Ponemon Institute study, 80% of respondents considered loss of intellectual property a risk of insecure file sharing practices. Of course, it’s true that these kinds of headline-grabbing, coordinated attacks on consumer and employee data pose a big threat. Target, Home Depot, Instagram, and Sony, just to name a few. Over the past several years, data breaches have been big news. Learning more about high profile data leaks reinforce the need for Google Drive security. It’s a shift in both where files reside and how they are accessed.

Compared to the traditional on-premises solution, Google Drive is a paradigm shift.

It’s especially true if you are responsible for securing your organization’s data. The thought of storing sensitive documents in the cloud can be a daunting one. Editor’s note: This post was updated in September 2020 with new insights and tips about Google Drive security.

Is google drive secure enough for hr